Trump Again Claims Immunity In Election Conspiracy Case With Appeal

By -

Former President Trump Holds Rally In Waterloo, Iowa

Former President Donald Trump’s legal team asked an appeals court to dismiss the the federal case charging him with attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election, saying presidents enjoy broad protection from criminal prosecution over their actions in office, the latest in an ongoing battle with federal prosecutors over immunity.


KEY FACTS

Trump’s legal team argued that presidents cannot be criminally prosecuted for “official acts unless he is first impeached and convicted by the Senate,” his lawyers wrote in a filing before a Washington, D.C. appeals court.

Trump was impeached by the House in January 2021 for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots, but was acquitted a month later in a trial before the Senate, which requires a vote of two-thirds of its members to convict a president.


The filing notes that for 234 years, “no current or former President had ever been criminally prosecuted for official acts” and asserts that “the historical fallout [of Trump’s prosecutions this year] is tremendous.”

The filing builds on an argument Trump has made in response to his various legal issues, including several civil cases, which have been unsuccessful thus far as federal district and appeals court judges have repeatedly ruled that Trump’s presidency does not grant him broad legal immunity.

Prosecutors and judges have consistently disagreed with Trump's legal argument that the Constitution protects former presidents from any criminal prosecution.

KEY BACKGROUND

The appeals court is reviewing Trump’s immunity claims after Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the federal government’s Jan. 6 case against Trump, rejected the argument in December, ruling Trump’s time in the White House does not give him the “divine right of kings to evade the criminal accountability that governs his fellow citizens.” Trump faces four felony charges in the case—obstruction of an official proceeding, conspiracy to obstruct, conspiracy to defraud the U.S. and conspiracy against rights—which could carry a combined maximum prison sentence of more than 50 years if convicted.

TANGENT

The appeals court is reviewing the case after the Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request from Special Counsel Jack Smith and the Justice Department to make a speedy ruling on the immunity claims so the case could go to trial before the 2024 election, if the court agrees with Chutkan. While the high court has never considered the question of whether a president can be criminally charged for actions taken while in office, its conservative lean does not guarantee it will side with Trump, and it’s indicated previously that presidents are not exempt from criminal proceedings. In 2020, it ordered him to comply with a grand jury subpoena, writing “no citizen, not even the President, is categorically above the common duty to produce evidence when called upon in a criminal proceeding.”

WHAT TO WATCH FOR

Whether Trump’s March 4 trial date in the case will be delayed as the court weighs the immunity question. The appeals court has scheduled oral arguments for Jan. 9 in the case, which is on hold while the appeals court considers Trump’s argument.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Characters In BBC’s Documentary On TB Joshua Unknown To Us – Synagogue Church

By -
Image
  The Synagogue Church of all Nations (SCOAN) has countered the BBC documentary on the late Temitope Babatunde Joshua, known as TB Joshua, founder of SCOAN. SCOAN described the documentary against TB Joshua as unfounded, and that the characters interviewed in the report were unknown to the church. The church, in a statement signed by its Public Affairs Director, Mr Dare Adejumo, said the statement was aimed at disabusing public minds from the report. The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) recalls that the BBC released a highly controversial and damning documentary on the late TB Joshua on Monday, accusing him of various crimes, including rape, against some members. SCOAN said, “BBC World Services investigative unit, code-named Africa Eye, came out this week with weird and strange episodes of atrocities against the late founder of SCOAN.” It said that to investigate and publish or broadcast reports was a central kernel of journalism, but to do so outside the ethics and fundamental principles
Read more

NBA Suspends Canada’s Joshua Primo For 4 Games For Exposing Himself To Women

By -
Image
  The NBA has suspended former San Antonio Spurs guard  Joshua Primo   for four games   ... after it says it found he exposed his private parts to multiple women. The league announced the ban on Friday morning ... saying an investigation into the free agent revealed he had "engaged in inappropriate and offensive behavior." NBA officials called his actions "conduct detrimental to the league." They did, however, note that they "did not find evidence that he engaged in any sexual or other misconduct apart from these brief exposures." "Primo maintains that his conduct was not intentional," the league said. Dr. Hillary Cauthen , Primo's former therapist, was the first to  bring the allegations  against Primo to light after she claimed last fall that he exposed himself to her on nine separate occasions. Dr. Cauthen's attorney,  Tony Buzbee , alleged the Spurs were aware of Primo's actions, but didn't take action. Cauthen went on to file
Read more

Sky Sports' On-Air Mix-Up: Chelsea Players Mistakenly Introduced as Axel Disasi Instead of Noni Madueke in Carabao Cup Semifinal

By -
Image
 Sky Sports were left red-faced after an on-screen graphic mistakenly introduced Chelsea defender Axel Disasi as Noni Madueke on Tuesday night. The pair were both the scoresheet as the Blues thrashed Middlesbrough 6-1 at Stamford Bridge in the second leg of the Carabao Cup semi-final to boo their place at Wembley. But when Disasi spoke to Sky Sports after the game, an on-screen graphic introduced him as Madueke instead. Madueke is four years younger than his Chelsea teammate, plays in a different role and is English, while Disasi is French. Viewers immediately spotted the mistake and took to social media to flag up the glaring error.  Sky Sports with a huge mistake as that is Axel Disasi, not Noni Madueke,' another added, while a third described the gaffe as a 'howler'. A fourth commented: 'Sky sports calling Disasi Madueke. They’ve done it again.' Disasi scored Chelsea's third goal in the 6-1 rout, converting Raheem Sterling's cross at the far post after th
Read more