Prosecutors Say Trump Enlisted Michael Cohen For 'Lies and Deception' In Closing Arguments

 Prosecutors and attorneys for former President Donald Trump presented their closing arguments in his criminal trial Tuesday, as the jury will decide whether Trump should be convicted on charges of falsifying records based on a hush money payment ex-attorney Michael Cohen made to adult film star Stormy Daniels—with the ex-president’s lawyer telling the jury they shouldn’t believe Cohen or Daniels’ testimony.

 Trump has been charged with 34 felony counts of falsifying business records based on his reimbursement checks to Cohen, and in order to convict Trump, the jury must decide there’s proof beyond a reasonable doubt Trump was responsible for false business records at the Trump Organization, and he did so in order to cover up another crime (such as tax crimes or campaign finance violations).

Trump’s lawyers made their arguments first, with attorney Todd Blanche telling jurors his client is “innocent” and denouncing Cohen, who testified Trump knew about the hush money scheme and personally approved it—claiming Cohen “told [jurors] a number of things from the witness stand that were lies,” as quoted by MSNBC.

The attorney also insisted that Trump’s reimbursement checks to Cohen weren’t falsely labeled as being for legal services as prosecutors claim, arguing Trump was paying Cohen for his legal services because he was the then-president’s personal attorney at the time—Cohen testified he was working for Trump for free and the reimbursement checks were separate—and claiming that if there was a scheme to reimburse Cohen, there’s “no evidence” Trump knew about it.

Blanche argued there’s no evidence that Trump had an “intent to defraud,” given that Trump disclosed the payments to Cohen on IRS and ethics forms, and sought to distance Trump from even knowing about the hush money payment to begin with, claiming, “There is no way that you can find that President Trump knew about this payment at the time it was made without believing the words of Michael Cohen.”

Prosecutor Joshua Steinglass, who delivered closing arguments for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, hit back against Blanche’s suggestion that prosecutors and their witnesses presented lies or misleading evidence to the jury, and claimed that if Cohen had lied under oath, he could have gone further in accusing Trump of criminality, but didn’t because “he's limited by what actually happened and he's not going to tell you anything beyond that.”

Steinglass also argued Trump hired Cohen “for the same qualities that his attorneys now urge you to reject his testimony because of,” as quoted by The New York Times, telling jurors Trump chose the ex-attorney “because he was willing to lie and cheat on Mr. Trump’s behalf.”

Prosecutors are “perfectly happy to have a witness commit perjury, to lie to you,” Blanche told the jury in his closing arguments, as quoted by CNN, going on to describe Cohen as “the MVP of liars” and “the human embodiment of reasonable doubt.” (Prosecutors objected to the first statement, which the judge sustained.)

Prosecutors disputed Blanche’s arguments Tuesday that Cohen can’t be trusted as a witness and tried to explain Cohen’s motivations to the jury, acknowledging that Cohen has an interest in the case but arguing he’s “understandably angry” because “he’s the one who’s paid the price for his role in this conspiracy” and “anyone in Cohen’s shoes would want the defendant to be held accountable,” as quoted by CNN. “This case is not about Michael Cohen, this case is about Donald Trump, and whether he should be held accountable,” Steinglass told the jury, claiming Trump’s attorneys are deflecting by attacking the ex-attorney’s credibility.

CNN. The Trump attorney described Cohen’s payment to Daniels as “extortion” and noted Daniels previously denied having an affair with Trump. Jurors do not have to believe Daniels’ allegations in order to convict Trump, however, given that the case is just based on whether his reimbursement checks were labeled falsely.

The jury will start deliberations once closing arguments end and the judge has delivered instructions to the jury. It’s unclear how long it will take before they reach a verdict. If Trump is convicted, each felony count against him is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 per offense and/or up to four years in prison, meaning Trump faces up to $170,000 in fines and 136 years in prison if he were convicted on every count and sentenced to the maximum. Legal experts believe it’s unlikely Trump would be sentenced to prison as a first-time offender—though it’s not out of the question. His sentencing would likely take place one or two months after the verdict.


Trump has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and decried the case as a “witch hunt” designed to hurt his campaign. The ex-president complained Monday on Truth Social that his lawyers are making their arguments first, saying allowing prosecutors to go last is a “BIG ADVANTAGE, VERY UNFAIR.” The order is not unique to his case, however: defense attorneys are required to give their closing arguments first under New York law, given that prosecutors are the ones who must provide the burden of proof showing Trump’s guilt.


Trump was indicted in Manhattan in March 2023 following a yearslong investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, and this case marks the first of his four criminal cases to go to trial. Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 just before the 2016 election in order to cover up her allegations of an affair, which Trump has long denied. Trump then reimbursed Cohen through a series of checks paid throughout 2017 that prosecutors argue were falsely labeled as being for legal services, which Trump also denies. Cohen later pleaded guilty to campaign finance crimes stemming from his payment to Daniels, and testified during the weekslong trial that Trump was directly involved with both the hush money scheme and the repayment plan. Trump’s lawyers have sought to discredit Cohen, with attorney Todd Blanche cross-examining him four three days about Cohen’s frequent criticism of the ex-president and history of lying under oath. Closing arguments come after the defense presented only one major witness before resting its case last week. Attorney Robert Costello tried to undercut Cohen’s testimony by testifying Cohen told him Trump had no knowledge of the hush money payment, though Costello’s testimony got derailed as Judge Juan Merchan admonished him for rolling his eyes and expressing annoyance with the judge.